It is my intention that this blog will be about writing. Although occasionally it may just be about reading. After all, what is the point of being writers if we're not also readers?
Sunday, June 28, 2015
Closing Out on a Dead Horse
Being tone-deaf allows me the privilege of thinking of myself as something of a musician. Being a hapless musician the best I can hope for is to accidentally stumble across what real musicians know as the perfect sound. It is a sound so pure that it can be felt by the musician and the audience alike. It owns all who are able to hear it. It evokes a feeling that you want to hold on to for as long as you can. (This can sometimes result in over-indulgent guitar solos by hack bands. The writers analogy, I believe, would be purple prose.)
With my writing, my purpose is not too dissimilar from that of the musician. I’m attempting to capture that perfect mix of words that will create a moment where the reader can actually feel beyond the words. My hope is to elicit a visceral response equivalent to that of the perfect sound. I want to awaken a buried memory in the service of whatever tale it is that I am trying to tell. And I’m hoping that I can create the emotional connection within the reader that will transport them to someplace that they want to hold on to for as long as they possibly can.
This brings me back to the beginning and the Stephen King quote. In order to learn the craft we must, of course, write, write, write, but we also need to read, read, read in order to understand the many nuances of the craft that we hope to master. (With any luck I’ll improve as a writer and look back on these words and want to puke; I’m hoping that day won’t be tomorrow.) I’ll close out this blog with some observations comments regarding my two most recently read books. Although they are the “Dead Horse” of the title that is in no way a meant as a comment regarding either of them. These books have had varying degrees of success in evoking visceral responses in me. I almost hated one and had to struggle to complete it. I loved the other. I enthusiastically suggest them both to writers interested in mastering the craft.
Ray Bradbury’s “Something Wicked This Way Comes” was really difficult for me to get through. The term “purple prose” was probably invented for this book. Bradbury spends a lot of words fondly reconstructing various moments of what must have been his Norman Rockwell-like youth. But, as much as I hated these diversions from anything resembling a plot, many of these isolated moments worked. They felt as vivid as my own dreams. I felt what it was like to be that kid, in that tree, at that moment in time. The touch, smell and visuals all felt right, but just like a real dream they didn’t hold together for long and quickly dissolved into nothingness. Many times I felt as though the plot, such as it was, was held together more by my determination to finish this book than anything written. Still, all of the individual poetic moments in this book both inspired and cautioned my own ambitions. The inspiration was in finding the courage to write to sentimental excess in order to reveal the greater meaning in the everyday occurrences that we often take for granted; the cautionary note is the knowledge that sometimes a thesaurus can be a really bad thing to have at your side.
The second book I’ll mention is David Mitchell’s “Cloud Atlas”. In its telling “Cloud Atlas” is more conventional than “Something Wicked…” However, instead of getting caught up in small moments the story weaves a much larger landscape that is virtually impossible to describe as it spans past and future generations with only the hint of a link. Unlike “The DaVinci Code” which tells a very linear tale, and is a good read in spite of all the cheap-shots its endured, the impact of “Cloud Atlas” is received only its conclusion and as the sum of all its parts hit you face on. It is the perfect note, the one that many musicians and writers have been chasing after for hundreds of years, seldom with only fleeting success. And that is what I, as a writer, try – so far not to my satisfaction – to do.
Sunday, May 17, 2015
Something Wicked
Finally, after many months of avoidance activities, I've finished reading the classic Ray Bradbury novel, "Something Wicked This Way Comes".
This review has been almost as difficult to write as the book was to read. My feelings towards this book constantly vacillated from wanting to toss it on the garbage heap to marveling at the poetry of so many of its truly great and beautifully written passages. As a reader there were many times were I was drawn in by the prose. At times it almost felt as though I was actually remembering the sights, sounds, smells and flavors of moments that I had experienced. But inevitably, the crash to reality would come as the sentimental passages, seemingly supplanting any actual story, were drawn out too thin. As the novel wore on, regardless of how poetic and brilliantly written many of passages were, I found myself growing weary for what felt like an endless run of overly romanticized, ultra-nostalgic moments.
I'm sure there is a technical term, other than tedious, to describe the running together of strings of adjectives and/or adverbs to describe a multiplicity of actions that most authors would relegate to a simple sentence. On many occasions Bradbury - sometimes brilliantly - wanders where others fear to tread. In describing an evil character who is simply waiting for his moment, Bradbury writes:
“so he scuttered, crept, scurried, stalked tip-toed, wafted, stood immensely still among the primates, the Egyptian monuments to bestial gods, brushed back histories if dead Africa, stayed awhile in Asia, then sauntered on to newer lands.”
While there were occasions where this method of writing works well, on more than a few occasions it falls flat and comes off sounding as though he simply ripped a page from a thesaurus.
There are too many moments where the story takes a back seat to prolonged periods of misty-eyed reminiscing. It isn't until halfway through the book that the there appears to be any interest in developing an actual plot. To be fair there are genuine moments of fear and apprehension, but they're not sustained and instead are buried under more reminiscing. From beginning to end the plot remains vague. It is unclear what motivates the villains. In fact it is unclear if the villains are legitimately evil or victims themselves.
The ending is too convenient. It is too pollyannish and meaningless to be satisfying. I will note that the books was published in 1962, although I'm not really sure that that should change anything. It may be that the book's format was daring for the time.
In the end, when it comes to recommending this book, I remain conflicted. I felt that, from a reader's perspective, there was a lack of involvement with either plot or characters. Because of my inability to develop any connection to the characters and situations, and because of the frequent forays into the poetic jungle, I struggled to complete this book. Yet, in-between the too many large sugary dollops of overly sentimental nostalgia it does contain some of the best and most poetic passages that I’ve ever read. For that reason alone it may be best to ignore my review and read this book for yourself. But don’t say I didn’t warn you.
Monday, February 2, 2015
The Greatest of Them All
Wednesday, January 21, 2015
Lost in the Cloud Atlas
“…only as you gasp your dying breath shall you understand, your life amounted to no more than one drop in a limitless ocean!"
"Yet what is any ocean but a multitude of drops?”
- David Mitchell